pad

reflection_and_ideas

ideas

asking guests to add links/references to report, opening it up in the future to a public, — ye s!! they can create annotations / links :)

make new media new again

maybe we should release this under metalabel?

reflections

ability to adust as me move forward with interviews

pivoting from o.g. more monolithic idea of a toolkit

critical:

western pool of experts

gender imbalance

accesssibility

MEETINGS - 4 and 5 July - debrief and future

to-do:

- emailing the guests: thank you and follow up! - ask for references / sharing links!

- cc everyone in the future!!!

- administration and budget/payment - inc is paying for carolina and marta

3 MINUTES each

**Aksioma: **

Echo Chamber:

**Aksioma: **

Echo Chamber:

INC:

- publishing longform with the aksioma book from noura

- report of expert sessions (toolkit in the application): deadline: late august

- void coming to the conference in march

- combine video and comic - needs updating, based on the video of valentina

- final publication - nero x inc: think of the conference of aksioma as a step of the project - 4 events - final publication should wrap up

NERO:

- developing within expanded publishing

- final publication promote and produce - promoting everything - the platform for this

- platform channel to stream the contents

- web to print platform for the zine - developing this method

- showing "landscape without a logos" - book - university of bolzano - asking to create trilogy - research center "studio image - transform visual knowldge"

- party committee gals in nero - studio visits - workshops, events, posters, printing - different tech and machines, riso machine - collective publishing - deliverables work in the first half

- hosting this session - its a deliverable!

5 JULY

10h—11h:30:

  1. debrief on the sessions
  2. methodology to process material
  3. emare - model example to take and consider/engage with
  4. timeline for the second half
  5. BIS!!! > more sessions like this ?

  6. recording conversation NOTES

  7. marcella receives newsletter - 1 million every year // big 2 million biennal: the group can apply for the 1 million - question of how to apply and who is in the lead - if geert starts a new institution? - associated partner is hva ? - for this, tommaso has to wait for september; question is who will be the other two partners?

  8. other network - portugal / spain? - gateway to latin america - maybe interesting?
  9. debrief:
    • marta: all went well - no issues! - but issue will be work load and amount hours to be put in making the sprint sessions - the format workerd and it was flexible and would alow to repeat the format - maybe we can also answer these questions ourselves. the output: keep it simple and not focus too much on textual elements - hyperlinked, a lot of references, get the definition going by using everyone’s ideas
    • carolina: enjoyed convo, positive to be here all together despite zoom interview, cohesivness of group, convos went well, good structure of interview, combining answers along the shape of the interview, one part editorial takes on expub together, plus annex, group of guests could have been more diverse in our circle, second one we should be more mindful/intentional, even tho all guests had valuable contribution, more help with note taking, agreeing on role division before session, fun!
    • marcela: also to get to know each other, our skills and limitations, we still like each other, personal approach was very important, ope, friendly, great job moderation, fit in very well also if didn’t join from the start, appointing only one main writer, can’t jump on fast notes, we can’t do this in this consortium, not be idealist, knowing our limitations, great tool and useful for future, do we have budget for more interviews? - final outcome: video editing tool - now, not a lot of writing work
    • janez: endorsing the keeping it simple approach of marta, editing all the transcription is a lot of work - generational divide and disucssions are valuable - good move to decide involve younger people leading
    • ilan: agreeing with marcel with note taking. were we victims of “technosolutionism” with using etherport? we don’t have to necessirily use a tool because it’s there. wants to do something he enjoys. thinking through diversity - this group is already “not diverse”, we are able-bodied etc. generational divides. we can produce more - we did not hear something completly “new”, because they are already in our network. for the future, we have to be more “challenging” , arguing to get some colour in, radical ideas from opening up the pool of contributors
      • –> marcela: this thinking for the next project, we took a small setp, good starting step, knowing each other is a good basis for the next
    • tommaso: designing the people better for next time - also maybe they didnt fit that much ? - but practices had a good perspective - we can have a definition withis this! also go outside of our comfort zone. this was supposed to be a design sprint. we don’t have anything “to design” - there is no workflow/solution to expanded publishing. important to focus on the future of publishing - proposing to focus on narrowing this, discuss some more specific themes from the sprint e.g. lowtech/donotpublish
    • lorenzo: should i agree or disagree, too early to say, good grocery but what can we cook, good to go so deep with the interviewees - shifting to networked publishing as concept - networked knowledge. more interesting to define this as a define research field, more than what is “expanded publishing” - finding a field in which to expand, good moment for reflection - more diverse pool of people not from an ethics - stepping forward - perspective, but to give different knowledge
      • – marcela: side knowledge is important , even in ways in which people work, think, collaborate
      • – marta: so many guests were curious about what we do and think, eager to connect on this
    • expansion and contamination - future of publishing: either academia and public funds or capitalism - curious to know something out of this
    • tommaso: discuss together - can we “decide the menu”?
    • ilan: shows redact
  10. two step process: looking / rough draft - sending out - summarising and then organising
  11. report - visualise the main keywords and tagging - marcel’s idea - incorporate redact and etheport?

12:00:

- talk with andrej (see point above)